Mega prompt: audit your social account like a buyer

Analyze my [PLATFORM] account @[HANDLE] using my post history from the last 90 days. Before you start: the specific engagement numbers you return will vary depending on which posts your search happens to surface. So do not build your conclusions on individual post metrics. I want structural patterns that would hold regardless of which posts you sampled. Where you do cite a number, mark it as sample-dependent. If you're inferring rather than reading, say so. Context on my business: I'm a [WHAT YOU MAKE]. [CREDENTIALS, PARTNERSHIPS, OR DAY JOB THAT ADDS CREDIBILITY]. I have [NUMBER] buyer types, wanting different things: - [BUYER TYPE 1] pays for [WHAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY BUYING]. For them, [ASPECT SOMEONE MIGHT CALL A WEAKNESS] is the product, not a weakness. - [BUYER TYPE 2] would pay for [WHAT THEY'RE BUYING]. I have less of this and want more. Closed deals have come mostly from [OUTBOUND / INBOUND / REFERRAL]. This platform is one part of a funnel that also includes [NEWSLETTER, SITE, OTHER CHANNELS]. Cover these: 1. Structural patterns. Across whatever sample you pull, what separates high from low performers mechanically: hook length, caption presence, media type, single vs thread, posting window. For each pattern, say how confident you are and why. If a format wins on one metric but loses on another, say which metric, since they matter differently to my two buyer types. Skip anything you'd only assert from one or two posts. 2. Where engagement dies inside a post. I want drop-off points, not totals. What happens to thread continuations, secondary posts, reply chains, and quote posts relative to the parent. If material I'm putting below the main post is going unseen, tell me. 3. Positioning read, twice. What [BUYER TYPE 1] concludes in 30 seconds, and whether my feed proves [WHAT THEY NEED PROVEN]. Then what [BUYER TYPE 2] concludes, and where it falls short of [THEIR BAR]. 4. Platform policy risk. My highest-performing format is [DESCRIBE FORMAT AND TYPICAL COPY]. Check this platform's current policies on [ENGAGEMENT SOLICITATION / DUPLICATE CONTENT / WHATEVER APPLIES] and assess whether my best format is also my most exposed one. Quote actual policy language if you can find it, and say plainly if you can't. If it is exposed, describe a lower-risk version of the same mechanic. 5. Comparison, structural only. Name three creators who monetize primarily through [MY BUSINESS MODEL] rather than [ADJACENT MODEL]. Ignore follower counts. Tell me how their post architecture differs from mine: what goes in the main post vs below it, how they package proof, what their CTA looks like. 6. Funnel gaps. Where does someone who wants to hire me lose the thread? Assume conversion happens off-platform, and name which specific posts should be carrying a next step and aren't. Finish with changes ranked by expected revenue impact, split into "protects or grows [BUYER TYPE 1] work" and "builds toward [BUYER TYPE 2] work." Name where the two conflict. Be blunt, and aim it at the business I actually run.