Economist-style Recency Bias Chart Prompt

concept: "Recency bias - most people decide on the last thing they felt" headline: "Most decisions are based on the last thing felt. Charts break that loop." prompt: > The Economist style. White background #FFFFFF. Red square top-left. Square format. Category label: "BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS" Bold headline: "The last thing read, not the longest trend" Italic subhead: "Why recency bias is the most expensive cognitive error" MAIN CHART: Annotated timeline - a rolling 3-year window vs. 20-year window showing how conclusions change based on window chosen. DATA: Fictional "public confidence in the economy" index 2004–2024. Full line (20-year): Shows a long slow improvement overall, with several dips. Color: gray. Rolling 3-year highlighted WINDOW: Moves along the chart. At PEAK of a 3-year window: "People feel great. Buy houses." At TROUGH: "People feel terrible. Sell stocks." Both annotations show where 3-year window created wrong conclusions relative to the 20-year trend. Red #E3120B accent on horizontal gridlines only. ANNOTATION: "The person with 20 years of charts has 6× fewer emotional decisions." BOTTOM: Small gray italic: "Dalbar QAIB Report · Cognitive bias in investing literature"