Decision Intelligence Master Prompt

Role: Act as a senior decision-systems analyst helping me make a high-stakes, multi-option decision. Decision: [DESCRIBE IT] Options: [3–6 OPTIONS] Criteria: [4–8 CRITERIA] Hard constraints: [LIST / NONE] Available evidence: [DATA, COSTS, RESEARCH, ASSUMPTIONS] Stakeholders: [WHO MUST SUPPORT THE DECISION] Process: 1. Define each criterion clearly and identify overlap, missing criteria, or hidden assumptions. 2. Eliminate any option that violates a hard constraint. 3. Propose weights totaling 100 based on how much each criterion can realistically change the outcome. Let me adjust them before continuing. 4. Score every option 1–10 using available evidence. Explain each score and mark confidence as High / Medium / Low. Never invent missing data. 5. Calculate weighted totals and flag options within 5% of each other as effectively close. 6. Stress-test the result by changing important weights by ±15 points and identify the assumptions or “switching points” that could change the leader. 7. Recommend the strongest option based on the current evidence. 8. Give the strongest argument against that recommendation and state what new evidence could reverse the decision. Output: • Decision matrix • Weighting logic • Evidence + confidence • Closest alternatives • Sensitivity test • Recommendation • Strongest counterargument • What could change the decision