Diskussion

Wachstumsengpass-Identifikations-Diagnoseframework

Von Wikiprompt, der freien Prompt-Enzyklopädie

Debashis Sarker
Beigetragen vonDebashis SarkerQuelle

1. März 2026

Wachstumsengpass-Identifikations-Diagnoseframework Ein umfassender Prompt für eine KI, die als Wachstumsberater agieren und ein diagnostisches Framework entwickeln soll, um Wachstumsengpässe einer Agentur zu identifizieren und zu priorisieren.

Prompt-InhaltSpeichern

🌐
# Growth Bottleneck Identifier - Diagnostic Framework ## Overview This framework is a monthly diagnostic system (10 minutes/week) that pinpoints your agency's primary growth constraint and tells you exactly what to fix first. Each month, score yourself across 7 modules, run the calculations, and execute the top 3 fixes from the prioritization engine. **How to use monthly:** - **Week 1 (10 min):** Score all modules, run calculations - **Week 2 (10 min):** Review top 3 fixes, assign owners - **Week 3 (10 min):** Check leading indicators - **Week 4 (10 min):** Adjust, re-score, plan next month --- ## Scorecard (0-5 Scoring) | Module | 0 | 3 | 5 | |--------|---|---|---| | **A) Capacity** | Utilization >110% or <40% - chaotic or idle | Utilization 70-85% - healthy but no room to grow | Utilization 85-95% with clear hiring trigger | | **B) Process** | No documented processes - everything ad hoc | Some processes exist but inconsistent | Full SOPs - delivery runs without founder involvement | | **C) Hiring** | No hiring plan - reactive only | Clear triggers defined but not executed | Hiring plan active - roles filled before bottleneck hits | | **D) Automation** | Zero automation - all manual | Basic templates exist | Key workflows automated - hours reclaimed monthly | | **E) Pricing** | No margin visibility - underpricing likely | Margin known but no pricing strategy | Pricing tested and optimized - value-based tiers | | **F) Lead Flow** | No pipeline visibility - leads random | Pipeline tracked but conversion unknown | Full funnel tracked - constraint stage identified and fixed | | **G) Prioritization** | Everything is priority - nothing gets done | Top 3 identified but execution inconsistent | Top 3 executed weekly - measurable results | **Total Score: ___ / 35** --- ## Module A: Capacity Constraint Analysis ### Formula ``` Weekly Hours Available = (Team Size × 40) × (1 - Admin Overhead %) Weekly Hours Required per Client = Avg Delivery Hours per Client per Week Max Client Load = Weekly Hours Available ÷ Weekly Hours Required per Client Current Utilization % = (Active Clients × Hours per Client) ÷ Hours Available × 100 ``` ### Worked Example (using your inputs) **Assumptions stated:** If you have 5 team members, 20% admin overhead, and each client requires 10 hours/week: ``` Weekly Hours Available = (5 × 40) × (1 - 0.20) = 160 hours Weekly Hours Required per Client = 10 hours Max Client Load = 160 ÷ 10 = 16 clients Current Utilization % = (8 clients × 10) ÷ 160 × 100 = 50% ``` **Output:** - Current utilization: 50% - Max clients at current staffing: 16 - Status: **UNDER CAPACITY** (you have room for 8 more clients before hitting limits) **If utilization >90%:** You are over capacity - delivery quality will suffer. Fix hiring before sales. --- ## Module B: Process Inefficiency Detector ### Top 5 Recurring Waste Categories | Waste Type | Typical Hours Lost/Month | Process Change to Reclaim | |------------|--------------------------|---------------------------| | **Meetings** | 8-12 hours | Implement async updates via Loom - only 1 weekly sync | | **Reporting** | 6-10 hours | Template all reports - client fills intake form pre-call | | **Revisions** | 4-8 hours | Add revision cap (2 rounds) to contract - charge beyond | | **Approvals** | 3-6 hours | Set 48-hour auto-approval window - no response = approved | | **Context Switching** | 5-8 hours | Batch client work into theme days (e.g., Monday = Client A) | ### Output **Estimated recoverable hours/month:** 26-44 hours (roughly 1 full work week) **Specific process changes:** 1. Replace status meetings with written async updates 2. Create master report template - 80% pre-filled 3. Add revision limit clause to all new contracts 4. Implement auto-approval after 48 hours 5. Block 2-hour deep work sessions per client per week --- ## Module C: Hiring Need Calculator ### Formula ``` Hours Needed for Growth Goal = (Target Clients - Current Clients) × Hours per Client per Week New Hires Needed = Hours Needed ÷ 40 (per hire) ``` ### Worked Example **Assumption:** Growth goal is 12 clients in 90 days (from 8 current): ``` Hours Needed = (12 - 8) × 10 = 40 hours/week New Hires Needed = 40 ÷ 40 = 1 full-time hire ``` ### Hiring Triggers | Role | Hire When... | Timeline | Capacity Gained | |------|--------------|----------|-----------------| | **Account Manager** | Utilization >85% OR 2+ SLA breaches in a month | Now | 10-15 client hours/week | | **Delivery Specialist** | Backlog >5 days OR revision requests >20% of deliverables | 30 days | 15-20 client hours/week | | **Ops/Admin** | Reporting/meetings consume >15% of founder time | 30 days | 5-8 hours/week reclaimed | | **Sales/BD** | Lead flow is strong but founder can't close - pipeline >5x capacity | 90 days | 10-15 new opportunities/month | ### Output **Hiring timeline:** - **Now:** Account Manager (if utilization >85%) - **30 days:** Delivery Specialist (if backlog grows) - **90 days:** Sales/BD (if pipeline supports it) --- ## Module D: Tool/Automation Gap Identifier ### Highest ROI Automations for Time Drains | Time Drain | Automation | Hours Saved/Month | Tool Category | |------------|-----------|-------------------|---------------| | Client intake | Automated intake form with qualification questions | 4-6 | Form builder + CRM | | Client comms | Template library + auto-fill from CRM | 3-5 | CRM + document generator | | Reporting | Auto-generated dashboards from project data | 6-8 | Reporting/BI tool | | Task routing | Auto-assign tasks based on workload | 3-4 | Project management tool | | QA checklists | Standardized checklists with sign-off | 2-3 | Checklist/process tool | ### Output **Automation shortlist (priority order):** 1. **Reporting automation** - saves 6-8 hours/month 2. **Client intake form** - saves 4-6 hours/month 3. **Template library** - saves 3-5 hours/month **Total potential savings:** 13-19 hours/month --- ## Module E: Pricing Problem Revealer ### Formulas ``` Revenue per Client = MRR ÷ Active Clients Delivery Cost per Client = (Team Hours per Client × Hourly Cost) + Tool Costs Effective Hourly Rate = Revenue per Client ÷ Hours per Client per Month Gross Margin % = (Revenue - Delivery Cost) ÷ Revenue × 100 ``` ### Worked Example **Assumptions:** MRR = $20,000, 8 clients, 10 hours/client/week, team cost = $50/hour: ``` Revenue per Client = $20,000 ÷ 8 = $2,500/month Delivery Cost per Client = (10 hours × 4 weeks × $50) = $2,000/month Effective Hourly Rate = $2,500 ÷ 40 hours = $62.50/hour Gross Margin % = ($2,500 - $2,000) ÷ $2,500 = 20% ``` ### Diagnosis | Symptom | Diagnosis | Pricing Move | |---------|-----------|--------------| | Margin <30% | Underpricing OR scope creep | Raise prices 15-20% for new clients | | Effective hourly rate <$75 | Underpricing | Repackage into value-based tiers | | Margin >60% but clients churn | Wrong packaging (too expensive for value) | Add lower entry tier | | Constant scope creep | No revision limits | Add performance fees + revision caps | ### Output **Pricing moves (based on your numbers):** 1. **Raise prices** 15-20% for new clients if margin <30% 2. **Repackage** into 3 tiers (Essential, Growth, Scale) with clear inclusions 3. **Add performance fee** - 10% of client revenue increase attributed to your work --- ## Module F: Lead Flow Bottleneck Finder ### Pipeline Mapping ``` Lead → Qualified → Sales Call → Proposal → Close → Onboard ``` ### Conversion Math ``` Stage Conversion % = (Stage Exits ÷ Stage Entries) × 100 Constraint Stage = Lowest Conversion % in the funnel ``` ### Worked Example **Assumptions:** 20 leads/month, 10 qualified, 5 sales calls, 3 proposals, 1 close: | Stage | Entries | Exits | Conversion % | |-------|---------|-------|--------------| | Lead → Qualified | 20 | 10 | 50% | | Qualified → Sales Call | 10 | 5 | 50% | | Sales Call → Proposal | 5 | 3 | 60% | | Proposal → Close | 3 | 1 | 33% | | Close → Onboard | 1 | 1 | 100% | **Leakiest stage:** Proposal → Close (33% - losing 2 of 3 proposals) ### 3 Fixes for the Leakiest Stage 1. **Offer:** Add a "starter scope" option - smaller commitment to reduce perceived risk 2. **Proof:** Include 2 case studies with specific ROI numbers in every proposal 3. **Follow-up:** Implement 3-touch follow-up sequence (day 3, 7, 14) with value-add content --- ## Module G: "Fix This First" Prioritization ### Impact × Effort × Risk Scoring **Scale:** Impact (1-5), Effort (1-5, lower = easier), Risk (1-5, lower = safer) **Score = Impact × (6 - Effort) × (6 - Risk)** | Fix | Impact | Effort | Risk | Score | Rank | |-----|--------|--------|------|-------|------| | Raise prices 15% for new clients | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 × 4 × 4 = 80 | 1 | | Add revision cap to contracts | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 × 5 × 5 = 100 | 1 | | Automate reporting | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 × 3 × 5 = 60 | 2 | | Hire Account Manager | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 × 2 × 3 = 30 | 3 | | Fix proposal follow-up | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 × 4 × 5 = 60 | 2 | | Implement async updates | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 × 4 × 5 = 60 | 2 | ### Top 3 Fixes for Next 14 Days | # | Fix | Steps | Owner | Time | Success Metric | 7-14 Day Indicator | |---|-----|-------|-------|------|----------------|-------------------| | 1 | **Add revision cap + raise prices** | 1) Update contract template 2) Notify existing clients of new terms 3) Apply to all new proposals | Founder | 3 hours | Margin >30% on new clients | 2+ proposals sent with new pricing | | 2 | **Automate reporting** | 1) Choose reporting tool 2) Set up dashboard templates 3) Connect data sources | Ops/Admin | 6 hours | 6+ hours saved/month | First automated report delivered | | 3 | **Fix proposal follow-up** | 1) Write 3 follow-up emails 2) Set up sequence in CRM 3) Apply to all open proposals | Founder/Sales | 2 hours | 50% proposal close rate | 2 follow-ups sent to pending proposals | --- ## Dashboard Summary | Bottleneck | Evidence | First Fix | Expected Result | |------------|----------|-----------|-----------------| | **Pricing** (if margin <30%) | Gross margin 20% - effective rate $62.50/hr | Raise prices 15% + add revision caps | Margin to 35%+ - 2 fewer low-value clients | | **Process** (if reporting/meetings >15% of time) | 26-44 hours lost/month to waste | Automate reporting + async updates | 13-19 hours reclaimed/month | | **Lead Flow** (if proposal close <40%) | 33% proposal close rate | Fix follow-up sequence + starter scope | Close rate to 50%+ - 1 extra client/month | --- ## 14-Day Action Plan Checklist **Day 1-2:** - [ ] Score all 7 modules (10 minutes) - [ ] Run capacity calculation with real numbers - [ ] Identify your #1 bottleneck **Day 3-5:** - [ ] Update contract template with revision cap - [ ] Draft new pricing structure (3 tiers) - [ ] Choose reporting automation tool **Day 6-8:** - [ ] Send new pricing to 2 existing clients (test) - [ ] Set up reporting dashboard - [ ] Write 3 follow-up email templates **Day 9-11:** - [ ] Apply new pricing to all new proposals - [ ] Launch automated reporting - [ ] Send follow-up sequence to all open proposals **Day 12-14:** - [ ] Review results - check leading indicators - [ ] Adjust approach based on feedback - [ ] Plan next 14-day sprint **Weekly (ongoing):** - [ ] 10-minute scorecard review - [ ] Track utilization % and margin % - [ ] Review pipeline conversion numbers

Melde dich an, um den vollständigen Prompt zu sehen

Weiter mit:

Mit der Anmeldung akzeptierst du unsere Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutz

Verwendung

Dieser Prompt ist für die Verwendung mit business gedacht. Kopiere den Inhalt oben und füge ihn in dein bevorzugtes KI-Tool ein.

Für beste Ergebnisse passe die Platzhalter (eckige Klammern oder Großbuchstaben) an deine Anforderungen an.

Referenzen

Kategorien:business| prompts.chat| agency-growth| diagnostic-framework

Diskussion