Wachstumsengpass-Identifikations-Diagnoseframework
Von Wikiprompt, der freien Prompt-Enzyklopädie
Wachstumsengpass-Identifikations-Diagnoseframework Ein umfassender Prompt für eine KI, die als Wachstumsberater agieren und ein diagnostisches Framework entwickeln soll, um Wachstumsengpässe einer Agentur zu identifizieren und zu priorisieren.
Prompt-InhaltSpeichern
🌐
# Growth Bottleneck Identifier - Diagnostic Framework
## Overview
This framework is a monthly diagnostic system (10 minutes/week) that pinpoints your agency's primary growth constraint and tells you exactly what to fix first. Each month, score yourself across 7 modules, run the calculations, and execute the top 3 fixes from the prioritization engine.
**How to use monthly:**
- **Week 1 (10 min):** Score all modules, run calculations
- **Week 2 (10 min):** Review top 3 fixes, assign owners
- **Week 3 (10 min):** Check leading indicators
- **Week 4 (10 min):** Adjust, re-score, plan next month
---
## Scorecard (0-5 Scoring)
| Module | 0 | 3 | 5 |
|--------|---|---|---|
| **A) Capacity** | Utilization >110% or <40% - chaotic or idle | Utilization 70-85% - healthy but no room to grow | Utilization 85-95% with clear hiring trigger |
| **B) Process** | No documented processes - everything ad hoc | Some processes exist but inconsistent | Full SOPs - delivery runs without founder involvement |
| **C) Hiring** | No hiring plan - reactive only | Clear triggers defined but not executed | Hiring plan active - roles filled before bottleneck hits |
| **D) Automation** | Zero automation - all manual | Basic templates exist | Key workflows automated - hours reclaimed monthly |
| **E) Pricing** | No margin visibility - underpricing likely | Margin known but no pricing strategy | Pricing tested and optimized - value-based tiers |
| **F) Lead Flow** | No pipeline visibility - leads random | Pipeline tracked but conversion unknown | Full funnel tracked - constraint stage identified and fixed |
| **G) Prioritization** | Everything is priority - nothing gets done | Top 3 identified but execution inconsistent | Top 3 executed weekly - measurable results |
**Total Score: ___ / 35**
---
## Module A: Capacity Constraint Analysis
### Formula
```
Weekly Hours Available = (Team Size × 40) × (1 - Admin Overhead %)
Weekly Hours Required per Client = Avg Delivery Hours per Client per Week
Max Client Load = Weekly Hours Available ÷ Weekly Hours Required per Client
Current Utilization % = (Active Clients × Hours per Client) ÷ Hours Available × 100
```
### Worked Example (using your inputs)
**Assumptions stated:** If you have 5 team members, 20% admin overhead, and each client requires 10 hours/week:
```
Weekly Hours Available = (5 × 40) × (1 - 0.20) = 160 hours
Weekly Hours Required per Client = 10 hours
Max Client Load = 160 ÷ 10 = 16 clients
Current Utilization % = (8 clients × 10) ÷ 160 × 100 = 50%
```
**Output:**
- Current utilization: 50%
- Max clients at current staffing: 16
- Status: **UNDER CAPACITY** (you have room for 8 more clients before hitting limits)
**If utilization >90%:** You are over capacity - delivery quality will suffer. Fix hiring before sales.
---
## Module B: Process Inefficiency Detector
### Top 5 Recurring Waste Categories
| Waste Type | Typical Hours Lost/Month | Process Change to Reclaim |
|------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|
| **Meetings** | 8-12 hours | Implement async updates via Loom - only 1 weekly sync |
| **Reporting** | 6-10 hours | Template all reports - client fills intake form pre-call |
| **Revisions** | 4-8 hours | Add revision cap (2 rounds) to contract - charge beyond |
| **Approvals** | 3-6 hours | Set 48-hour auto-approval window - no response = approved |
| **Context Switching** | 5-8 hours | Batch client work into theme days (e.g., Monday = Client A) |
### Output
**Estimated recoverable hours/month:** 26-44 hours (roughly 1 full work week)
**Specific process changes:**
1. Replace status meetings with written async updates
2. Create master report template - 80% pre-filled
3. Add revision limit clause to all new contracts
4. Implement auto-approval after 48 hours
5. Block 2-hour deep work sessions per client per week
---
## Module C: Hiring Need Calculator
### Formula
```
Hours Needed for Growth Goal = (Target Clients - Current Clients) × Hours per Client per Week
New Hires Needed = Hours Needed ÷ 40 (per hire)
```
### Worked Example
**Assumption:** Growth goal is 12 clients in 90 days (from 8 current):
```
Hours Needed = (12 - 8) × 10 = 40 hours/week
New Hires Needed = 40 ÷ 40 = 1 full-time hire
```
### Hiring Triggers
| Role | Hire When... | Timeline | Capacity Gained |
|------|--------------|----------|-----------------|
| **Account Manager** | Utilization >85% OR 2+ SLA breaches in a month | Now | 10-15 client hours/week |
| **Delivery Specialist** | Backlog >5 days OR revision requests >20% of deliverables | 30 days | 15-20 client hours/week |
| **Ops/Admin** | Reporting/meetings consume >15% of founder time | 30 days | 5-8 hours/week reclaimed |
| **Sales/BD** | Lead flow is strong but founder can't close - pipeline >5x capacity | 90 days | 10-15 new opportunities/month |
### Output
**Hiring timeline:**
- **Now:** Account Manager (if utilization >85%)
- **30 days:** Delivery Specialist (if backlog grows)
- **90 days:** Sales/BD (if pipeline supports it)
---
## Module D: Tool/Automation Gap Identifier
### Highest ROI Automations for Time Drains
| Time Drain | Automation | Hours Saved/Month | Tool Category |
|------------|-----------|-------------------|---------------|
| Client intake | Automated intake form with qualification questions | 4-6 | Form builder + CRM |
| Client comms | Template library + auto-fill from CRM | 3-5 | CRM + document generator |
| Reporting | Auto-generated dashboards from project data | 6-8 | Reporting/BI tool |
| Task routing | Auto-assign tasks based on workload | 3-4 | Project management tool |
| QA checklists | Standardized checklists with sign-off | 2-3 | Checklist/process tool |
### Output
**Automation shortlist (priority order):**
1. **Reporting automation** - saves 6-8 hours/month
2. **Client intake form** - saves 4-6 hours/month
3. **Template library** - saves 3-5 hours/month
**Total potential savings:** 13-19 hours/month
---
## Module E: Pricing Problem Revealer
### Formulas
```
Revenue per Client = MRR ÷ Active Clients
Delivery Cost per Client = (Team Hours per Client × Hourly Cost) + Tool Costs
Effective Hourly Rate = Revenue per Client ÷ Hours per Client per Month
Gross Margin % = (Revenue - Delivery Cost) ÷ Revenue × 100
```
### Worked Example
**Assumptions:** MRR = $20,000, 8 clients, 10 hours/client/week, team cost = $50/hour:
```
Revenue per Client = $20,000 ÷ 8 = $2,500/month
Delivery Cost per Client = (10 hours × 4 weeks × $50) = $2,000/month
Effective Hourly Rate = $2,500 ÷ 40 hours = $62.50/hour
Gross Margin % = ($2,500 - $2,000) ÷ $2,500 = 20%
```
### Diagnosis
| Symptom | Diagnosis | Pricing Move |
|---------|-----------|--------------|
| Margin <30% | Underpricing OR scope creep | Raise prices 15-20% for new clients |
| Effective hourly rate <$75 | Underpricing | Repackage into value-based tiers |
| Margin >60% but clients churn | Wrong packaging (too expensive for value) | Add lower entry tier |
| Constant scope creep | No revision limits | Add performance fees + revision caps |
### Output
**Pricing moves (based on your numbers):**
1. **Raise prices** 15-20% for new clients if margin <30%
2. **Repackage** into 3 tiers (Essential, Growth, Scale) with clear inclusions
3. **Add performance fee** - 10% of client revenue increase attributed to your work
---
## Module F: Lead Flow Bottleneck Finder
### Pipeline Mapping
```
Lead → Qualified → Sales Call → Proposal → Close → Onboard
```
### Conversion Math
```
Stage Conversion % = (Stage Exits ÷ Stage Entries) × 100
Constraint Stage = Lowest Conversion % in the funnel
```
### Worked Example
**Assumptions:** 20 leads/month, 10 qualified, 5 sales calls, 3 proposals, 1 close:
| Stage | Entries | Exits | Conversion % |
|-------|---------|-------|--------------|
| Lead → Qualified | 20 | 10 | 50% |
| Qualified → Sales Call | 10 | 5 | 50% |
| Sales Call → Proposal | 5 | 3 | 60% |
| Proposal → Close | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| Close → Onboard | 1 | 1 | 100% |
**Leakiest stage:** Proposal → Close (33% - losing 2 of 3 proposals)
### 3 Fixes for the Leakiest Stage
1. **Offer:** Add a "starter scope" option - smaller commitment to reduce perceived risk
2. **Proof:** Include 2 case studies with specific ROI numbers in every proposal
3. **Follow-up:** Implement 3-touch follow-up sequence (day 3, 7, 14) with value-add content
---
## Module G: "Fix This First" Prioritization
### Impact × Effort × Risk Scoring
**Scale:** Impact (1-5), Effort (1-5, lower = easier), Risk (1-5, lower = safer)
**Score = Impact × (6 - Effort) × (6 - Risk)**
| Fix | Impact | Effort | Risk | Score | Rank |
|-----|--------|--------|------|-------|------|
| Raise prices 15% for new clients | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 × 4 × 4 = 80 | 1 |
| Add revision cap to contracts | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 × 5 × 5 = 100 | 1 |
| Automate reporting | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 × 3 × 5 = 60 | 2 |
| Hire Account Manager | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 × 2 × 3 = 30 | 3 |
| Fix proposal follow-up | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 × 4 × 5 = 60 | 2 |
| Implement async updates | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 × 4 × 5 = 60 | 2 |
### Top 3 Fixes for Next 14 Days
| # | Fix | Steps | Owner | Time | Success Metric | 7-14 Day Indicator |
|---|-----|-------|-------|------|----------------|-------------------|
| 1 | **Add revision cap + raise prices** | 1) Update contract template 2) Notify existing clients of new terms 3) Apply to all new proposals | Founder | 3 hours | Margin >30% on new clients | 2+ proposals sent with new pricing |
| 2 | **Automate reporting** | 1) Choose reporting tool 2) Set up dashboard templates 3) Connect data sources | Ops/Admin | 6 hours | 6+ hours saved/month | First automated report delivered |
| 3 | **Fix proposal follow-up** | 1) Write 3 follow-up emails 2) Set up sequence in CRM 3) Apply to all open proposals | Founder/Sales | 2 hours | 50% proposal close rate | 2 follow-ups sent to pending proposals |
---
## Dashboard Summary
| Bottleneck | Evidence | First Fix | Expected Result |
|------------|----------|-----------|-----------------|
| **Pricing** (if margin <30%) | Gross margin 20% - effective rate $62.50/hr | Raise prices 15% + add revision caps | Margin to 35%+ - 2 fewer low-value clients |
| **Process** (if reporting/meetings >15% of time) | 26-44 hours lost/month to waste | Automate reporting + async updates | 13-19 hours reclaimed/month |
| **Lead Flow** (if proposal close <40%) | 33% proposal close rate | Fix follow-up sequence + starter scope | Close rate to 50%+ - 1 extra client/month |
---
## 14-Day Action Plan Checklist
**Day 1-2:**
- [ ] Score all 7 modules (10 minutes)
- [ ] Run capacity calculation with real numbers
- [ ] Identify your #1 bottleneck
**Day 3-5:**
- [ ] Update contract template with revision cap
- [ ] Draft new pricing structure (3 tiers)
- [ ] Choose reporting automation tool
**Day 6-8:**
- [ ] Send new pricing to 2 existing clients (test)
- [ ] Set up reporting dashboard
- [ ] Write 3 follow-up email templates
**Day 9-11:**
- [ ] Apply new pricing to all new proposals
- [ ] Launch automated reporting
- [ ] Send follow-up sequence to all open proposals
**Day 12-14:**
- [ ] Review results - check leading indicators
- [ ] Adjust approach based on feedback
- [ ] Plan next 14-day sprint
**Weekly (ongoing):**
- [ ] 10-minute scorecard review
- [ ] Track utilization % and margin %
- [ ] Review pipeline conversion numbers
Melde dich an, um den vollständigen Prompt zu sehen
Weiter mit:
Mit der Anmeldung akzeptierst du unsere Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutz
Verwendung
Dieser Prompt ist für die Verwendung mit business gedacht. Kopiere den Inhalt oben und füge ihn in dein bevorzugtes KI-Tool ein.
Für beste Ergebnisse passe die Platzhalter (eckige Klammern oder Großbuchstaben) an deine Anforderungen an.
Diskussion
0 Kommentare